Ken Borland comments on the Derek Crookes saga
The whole Derek Crookes saga, resolved on Thursday when the South African all-rounder agreed to remain with the Gauteng team, is a very good example of history repeating itself
Ken Borland
18-Sep-1999
The whole Derek Crookes saga, resolved on Thursday when the South
African all-rounder agreed to remain with the Gauteng team, is a
very good example of history repeating itself.
On the eve of the 1997/98 season, Crookes, although contracted by
the United Cricket Board (UCB) to Natal, left Durban for
Johannesburg, enticed by bonus money.
In the last few weeks, Crookes has been fighting both the Gauteng
heirachy and the UCB in a bid to move to Easterns, but he has
finally agreed to obey the terms of his UCB contract which forbid
him from moving provinces after the cut-off date of July 31.
National squad players have to state the province they will be
playing for as part of their UCB contract and cannot change
provinces until the UCB contract expires. In 1997, Natal had
banked on Crookes, who had a UCB contract then, too, playing for
them, but he received an offer from Gauteng he felt he could not
refuse and he moved to Johannesburg a matter of weeks before the
season started.
Natal, then coached by current national mentor Graham Ford, were
understandably upset but agreed to let the player go and did not
take the issue any further, hence no UCB involvement. Natal's
policy has always been that if a player does not want to stay,
there is no point in keeping him. Even though the current Crookes
dispute has now been resolved, sadly, there are no winners.
Easterns, who wanted the former Hilton College pupil as the
keystone of their ambitious development programmes for the new
season, are now bitterly disappointed as they have lost a major
sponsor an a drawcard - and have little time to find a
replacement for either.
The Gauteng Cricket Board come out of the whole affair with the
least credit. In a bid to scupper Crookes' move to Easterns, they
reported that their estranged former coach, Ray Jennings, was
using illegal bonus money as an enticement. In the process, they
admitted that Jennings had done the same thing to lure Crookes to
Gauteng in the first place, violating a UCB stipulation that
their contracted national squad players should not receive any
extra payments from their provinces.
Gauteng are now saddled with a player who does not want to be
there, and a recalcitrant Crookes will also draw the animosity of
the other Gauteng players.
One can only hope that Crookes, who has no match practice under
his belt, can still show sufficient form to keep his place in the
national squad. That will at least mean spending more time with a
team he wants to be with.